|
|


I think I should preface this by saying that
Gangs of New York is a good movie. If you are one of those
people who feels a particular reverence for the city of New York, then you
will probably enjoy it much more than I did. I do not feel reverence
for New York, and it does not hold a special place in my heart. It
is just another city to me. I've actually never been there.
When 9/11 was happening, I wasn't thinking, "Oh my god, not New York!
Anywhere but New York!". My thoughts were more along the lines of,
"I'm glad that isn't me." I feel the same way about Los Angeles.
If someone was invading LA, I wouldn't defend the city itself to the
death. I think I'd pack up my girl and our stuff and head for San
Francisco or Las Vegas. I guess what I'm trying to get across is
that I'm not particularly concerned about which patch of dirt I get to
live on. I think Gangs of New York operates under the
pretense that New York is the most important city in the U.S. and everyone
should be concerned with its history and pay it due respect. Now,
onto the movie.
Gangs
is about the city of New York in the mid 1800s during the time of the
Civil War. The different ethnicities of the area were all trying to
carve out a particular portion of the city, but the "natives" who all
looked shockingly anglo to me don't want any of the immigrants on their
turf. So Daniel Day Lewis and Liam Neeson meet up in the middle of
town with their particular armies and hack each other to pieces over it.
On a side note, I thought that Lewis was a big proponent of Irish civil
liberties and all things Irish. So I was a little distracted seeing
him as the leader of the natives killing the Irish. I guess I
shouldn't carry an actor's politics into the theater with me.
Anyway, Bill the Butcher (Lewis) kills 'Priest' Vallon (Neeson) in front
Vallon's son (DiCaprio), in this fight and a native victory is put up on
the calendar. 16 years after fleeing the scene, Amsterdam (DiCaprio)
returns to the city with the intention of killing Bill.
Gangs feels much more like a period piece
than a "gangster" movie, which is the intent I think. As a matter of
fact, during the first minutes of the movie, I thought it looked
particularly post-Apocalyptic as Neeson leads his son through what look to
be caverns of people wearing tattered clothes and forging weapons like
halberds and swords. The opening of the movie is particularly fierce
and puts you in the right frame of mind for the rest. The sets are
all amazing and the costumes and production design is all very convincing.
I'm not sure what they were convincing me of, though, because I had never
heard of this particularly piece of American history.
One
of the problems that I have with the movie is that I wasn't sure who I
wanted to win. I see the natives point of view in that they saw the
immigrants as invaders, but the Irish were just looking for a better life.
Also, they bring up the Civil War draft and racism and lots of other
issues that confuse the story. I wanted the story to be about a boy
avenging the death of his father, but it turns into more than that by the
end. Daniel Day Lewis is terrific as Bill the Butcher, and DiCaprio
sells his part as the vengeful son. I thought that Cameron Diaz was
decent in a forgettable part, so I'm not sure why she got a Golden Globe
nomination. This movie is definitely worth seeing, but it doesn't
feel as important as everyone is making it out to be. Braveheart
still feels more passionate in my opinion.
I understand that New York is an important city
from a cultural and artistic standpoint, but since I had never heard of
all this trouble and rioting in New York before, I was not really touched
by the plight of the people in this movie. I don't want to take
anything away from it. It is very well directed, well written, and
well acted, but at the end, I feel no different about New York or its
people.
|